{"id":15697,"date":"2024-09-30T10:10:24","date_gmt":"2024-09-30T15:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/?p=15697"},"modified":"2024-09-29T00:30:40","modified_gmt":"2024-09-29T05:30:40","slug":"wapello-bypass-at-meeting-stage-again-now-with-100-more-exits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2024\/09\/wapello-bypass-at-meeting-stage-again-now-with-100-more-exits\/","title":{"rendered":"Wapello bypass at meeting stage again (now with 100% more exits!)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tuesday night is going to have a rarity for highway construction plans nowadays, a formal meeting. An &#8220;updated preliminary design&#8221; for the US 61 Wapello bypass comes six years after the initial proposal. It includes a huge change. The new design has a full interchange south of Wapello, northeast of the 65th Street\/K Avenue intersection.<\/p>\n<p>If this isn&#8217;t the first time that a city has succeeded in getting the state to change its four-lane plans in a big way, it&#8217;s one of a very few. <a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2018\/05\/wapello-bypass-plans-finalized\/\">The 2018 plan<\/a> involved only one point of access to Wapello, the G62 exit. Residents and emergency services hated it. Then in 2019 the DOT offered a <a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2019\/09\/wapello-half-exit-not-without-drawbacks\/\">half-interchange slip ramp<\/a> at the south end. Residents and emergency services still hated it. In 2020 <a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2020\/04\/wapello-connection-debate-solved\/\">the DOT offered a J-turn<\/a> at the south end. The J-turn concept\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2014\/02\/benton-county-opposes-j-turn-at-30218-intersection\/\">became so toxic<\/a> in the 2010s that the Iowa DOT rebranded it as a &#8220;restricted crossing U-turn intersection.&#8221; That&#8217;s the name applied when the <a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2022\/10\/a-reduced-conflict-intersection-by-any-other-name\/\">first one opened in Iowa<\/a> southeast of Fort Dodge on US 20. (It wouldn&#8217;t have been needed if the new gas station there had opened up a mile to the west at the Coalville exit. Alas.)<\/p>\n<p>But now \u2014 again, <em>six years<\/em> after the preliminary-but-ideally-final plan was released and Wapello raised holy hell \u2014 it very much looks like the city will get everything it wanted, even a Business 61 route.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2021\/05\/us-61-four-lane-where-the-rest-stands-now\/\">In May 2021 I said<\/a> that Thanksgiving 2030 would be a realistic possibility for completion of the four-lane US 61. As of now, the five-year plan has paving of the Wapello bypass in fiscal year 2029 (late 2028-early 2029). I may have a horn to toot later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tuesday night is going to have a rarity for highway construction plans nowadays, a formal meeting. An &#8220;updated preliminary design&#8221; for the US 61 Wapello bypass comes six years after the initial proposal. It includes a huge change. The new &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/2024\/09\/wapello-bypass-at-meeting-stage-again-now-with-100-more-exits\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-construction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15697"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15697\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15700,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15697\/revisions\/15700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/iowahighwayends.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}