Iowa Highway Ends (etc.)

The 11 Division I-A football conference commissioners (and Notre Dame AD Jack Swarbrick, can’t forget him, reminding us that Notre Dame answers to no one) are reportedly close to announcing what the new college football postseason structure will look like.

This comes about after Iowa State’s sixth victory of the 2011 season resulted in Alabama weaseling its way into ending up in the BCS championship game against a team it had already lost to. (Utah State’s collapse against Auburn is a likely second factor that pushed Alabama over Oklahoma State.) There will no longer be “automatic qualifier” conferences, but the separation will exist by fact if not by law. There are the Big Five and everybody else. It’s too late to tell that genie to give up TV contracts.

Will the loss of “AQ” designation put a pause to conference musical chairs? Maybe. But there is still money to be had, and lots of it. That brings me back to an Andy Staples column from earlier this month, dealing with his fear that the power conferences would secede from the NCAA and form their own group, creating basketball tournaments without “Cinderellas.”

No more Lehigh over Duke. No more Northern Iowa over Kansas. No more Hampton over Iowa State. A division of strictly economic heavyweights might not want to split the take with have-nots. That’s exactly what happened in football when the BCS was created. 

Take a look at the three victims he uses in his examples. One of them is not like the other two. One does not have gobs of basketball championship trophies. One has only been a 2-seed twice in its entire history.

Why bring attention to this? Because two years ago, Staples suggested expelling Iowa State from the power conference ranks.

So, which are the Cyclones? Are they one of the economic heavyweights, a team that everyone enjoys seeing fall to a plucky mid-major? Are they a small-budget have-not who shouldn’t be sitting at the adults’ table? Or are they the Schroedinger’s Cat of college athletics, existing in both states and becoming one or the other only upon observation?

The answer lies somewhere in the middle. But after seeing “Iowa State” used practically as a synonym for “college sports bottom-feeder” across the Internet, please forgive those of us who aren’t quite done looking over our shoulders.

Noted Iowa State hater Pat Forde is at it again.

What about the move to outlaw 6-6 teams from bowl games: That will definitely spur some discussion and debate. In that scenario, several bowls likely would be put out of business.

On one level — the Vanderbilt/Washington State/Syracuse/Duke/Indiana/Iowa State level — getting to 6-6 and going to a bowl is an accomplishment. Commissioners are cognizant of that and don’t want to keep their lower-echelon programs from hitting a high point on occasion.

Iowa State went 6-6 in the regular season last year, and Paul Rhoads got a contract extension, so this isn’t a random point. Remember, Rhoads is one failed two-point conversion away from being perfectly mediocre in the regular season for three years. (He’s 18-20 overall.)

I don’t particularly like bowls for 6-6 teams either, and I say that as a fan of one of the major beneficiaries. However, when there are so many bowls that it is imperative to a coach’s job that six wins be attained in some manner, it’s inescapable. It also leads to a nonconference schedule of Iowa, a I-AA team that more often than not is UNI, and a non-BCS team. The home-and-home with UConn and the 2002 Eddie Robinson Classic against Florida State have been the only regular-season games against any BCS opponent not named Iowa since Minnesota in 1997 — and before that, TCU and Rice when they were still in the Southwest Conference. A nine-game conference slate isn’t going to change that any time soon, although Navy’s move to the Big East will happen before a home-and-home with them in 2018-19.

I think the number of bowls should be cut such that even some 7-5 teams stay home, as long as coaching contracts and ADs and fans recognize that that doesn’t automatically mean someone should be fired. That may be the biggest mental block of all.

But all that is tangent to my original point of contention: Lumping us in the same football category as Duke? That hurts. (Counterpoint: The Blue Devils actually managed to win a couple of conference championships.)

Summitt on the sidelines vs. Baylor, March 26, 2012

My tickets for the 2012 NCAA Women’s Sweet Sixteen and Elite Eight games were right across from the Tennessee bench. I finally had a chance to see coaching legend Pat Summitt on the court in person.

But during that first half against Kansas, when the Lady Vols fell behind, I took a couple more glances than usual at the sidelines. At the end of the game, after Tennessee had pulled it out, I had a sad realization.

Pat Summitt was not coaching that team.

Sure, she was watching attentively, was in the huddle during timeouts, but most of the time, it was assistant Holly Warlick who was getting animated, telling the players what to do, chewing out the ref. If you didn’t know who was who, Warlick was the coach, period. Summitt did much more sitting than standing.

Others noticed the same thing happening during the season.

The crowd gave Summitt a standing ovation before and after both games.

Summitt will still be with Tennessee, but as head coach emeritus (emerita?). It is the end of a long and important chapter in the history of college sports.